Home › Glossary
Glossary
Plain-English definitions for the terms used across this site — not a substitute for legal advice, just enough to make sense of what a council page is actually telling you.
- Annual review
- The yearly check a council must carry out on every EHC plan it maintains, to decide whether it should stay the same, be amended, or stop ("cease to maintain"). A council's decision after an annual review can itself be appealed.
- Appealable decision
- One of a fixed set of council decisions a parent or young person is legally entitled to appeal to the SEND Tribunal about — for example, refusing to assess, refusing to issue a plan, or the content of Sections B, F or I. The DfE's own "appeal rate" figures used on this site are appeals as a share of these decisions specifically, not of all council activity.
- Cease to maintain
- A council's decision to stop an EHC plan altogether, usually because it decides the child or young person no longer needs one. This is itself an appealable decision.
- Consent order
- An agreement between a family and a council that settles an appeal before it reaches a tribunal hearing — the council agrees to some or all of what's being asked for. Most SEND appeals end this way rather than with a judge's ruling, which is the whole reason this site tracks a three-way split (resolved before hearing / contested and lost / contested and won) instead of a single win rate.
- EHC needs assessment
- The formal assessment a council must carry out to decide whether a child or young person needs an EHC plan. A council refusing to carry one out is a separate, and separately appealable, decision from refusing to issue a plan afterwards.
- EHC plan / EHCP
- Education, Health and Care plan — the legal document setting out a child or young person's special educational needs and the support a council must provide. Introduced by the Children and Families Act 2014, replacing the older "Statement of SEN."
- First-tier Tribunal (SEND)
- The tribunal that actually hears SEND appeals — often just called "the SEND Tribunal" on this site and elsewhere. Its decisions aren't published anywhere in England, which is why this site's per-council figures come from Freedom of Information responses rather than an official case archive.
- Freedom of Information (FOI)
- The legal right, under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, to ask a public body like a council for information it holds. Every per-council figure on this site traces back to an FOI response someone has already made and published — see methodology.
- Local Offer
- Each council's own published information about the SEND support available in its area, which every council is legally required to maintain. A council's SENDIAS service (see below) is usually listed there.
- Mediation
- A meeting with an independent mediator, required before most SEND appeals can proceed, aimed at resolving the disagreement without a tribunal hearing. Attending is compulsory to get a right of appeal; agreeing with the outcome is not.
- SEN / SEND
- Special Educational Needs, and Special Educational Needs and Disabilities — used close to interchangeably in practice, though SEND is the newer, broader term used in the Children and Families Act 2014 and in most current official statistics.
- SENDIASS
- SEND Information, Advice and Support Service — the free, impartial advice service every council is legally required to fund, run independently of the council itself. Linked on every council's page on this site, where known.
- Section B, F, I
- The three parts of an EHC plan most often disputed at tribunal: Section B describes a child's special educational needs, Section F the special educational provision a council must arrange to meet them, and Section I names the school, college or other institution the child will attend. This site's decision-type breakdown is built around these three.
- Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber / UKUT AAC)
- The tribunal that hears appeals against a First-tier Tribunal (SEND) decision on a point of law — not a full re-hearing of the case. Its decisions, unlike the First-tier Tribunal's, are published and form real legal precedent.