SEND & EHCP Tribunal Index
HomeWest Midlands › Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council

Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council

Refused or stalled

West Midlands

161
appeals registered, 2024 (official DfE figure)
184
appeals registered, 2025 (official DfE figure)
Refused or stalled. A request was made but was refused, withdrawn, or never substantively answered.

Estimated outcome breakdown

Estimated, not reported
72.3%
18.5%
Resolved before hearing — 133 (72.3%) Contested, council lost — 34 (18.5%) Contested, council won — 9 (4.9%) Partially split — 8 (4.3%)

This council's own answer doesn't give a usable outcome breakdown. This estimate applies the pooled England-wide outcome rate (no regional sample was large enough to trust on its own) to this council's own real, officially-published appeal volume for 2025 (184 appeals) — see how estimates work.

Freedom of Information responses

Awaiting internal review
Requested by Lyndsay Critchlow on 2022-12-10 · answered 2023-01-09 · covers —
Council refused the substantive request under FOIA s.22 (information held with a view to future publication), stating that most questions (appeal/refusal counts and upheld counts, EHCP headcount/setting split, EOTAS, no-placement count) would appear in the Department for Education's national SEN2 return, expected around June of the following year. On the 'parental preference for placement named' question the council explicitly read this — 'due to the nature and ordering of the questions' — as asking about Section I Tribunal appeals upheld in the parent's favour, and said that figure would likewise be in the DfE SEN2 data; if the question instead meant EHCPs generally naming a parent's preferred setting, that part was declined separately under s.12 (cost limit; council said checking over 2,000 individual files manually would be required). No figures of any kind were disclosed. The requester lodged internal review challenges on 9 and 20 January 2023 (citing ICO guidance that s.22 requires a genuine publication-intention analysis and a documented public interest test); no further correspondence appears on the public thread after 20 Jan 2023.
Caveat: Directly relevant negative finding: the council explicitly declined to give LA-level SEND tribunal/appeal outcome data on the grounds that it will eventually appear only in aggregate national DfE SEN2 statistics — precisely the LA-level gap this project exists to fill. No figures were released and the internal review appears unresolved on the public record.